From a story telling standpoint, The Breakfast Club is perfect. It hits everything it sets out to do, without overtelling, or being something its not. The characters start as completely opposite from each other and the direction of the plot is developing and exploring the interaction between them, which the movie makes no effort to hide. There could have been some crisis, like the principle is in danger and they all have to work together to save him. No, the film has them sit in a room and talk. You may say it is boring, but to me, the exploration of these characters is compelling.
One of the main concern I felt was the inaccurate representation of a true teen, as they were all stereotypes. I think stereotypes are insanely bad scriptwriting... if they are left alone. If the point of the character was to introduce a stereotype (a zone of comfort in Campbell's story) and then break that mold, then it is intentional and should be looked at as such. In the second act, they act less and less like they did from beginning, hell they all sat around and smoked together.
I think that The Breakfast Club takes one of the oldest, easiest, and the most effective stories and by throwing in high school students, Hughes makes is so we can all relate. We have seen this story many times, a bunch of misfits and/or different classes are put in a situation where they are forced to spend time with each other. This time spent starts off difficult but usually ends in mutual respect for each other, as they have found out that they are not really that different, they just deal with problems in different ways. We have seen it in war movies, police enforcement movies, and tons of TV shows including Freaks and Geeks, the Inbetweeners, and most importantly Community... but i'll get to that. In Campbell's 12 steps, each of their character arcs start off in a place of comfort. For most this is the easiest ways to deal with the problems that become the point of the arc. In The Breakfast Club's case they fell into stereotypes to deal with their problems.
The kids problems is a big part of the movie and sure you can say that they are in high school, just write it off, forget about it. I can't take that seriously because the development in high school is the biggest part of figuring out who you want to be and how you want to be towards other people. You can see these kids struggling with that too, with Allison being ignored at home and spending the entire movie both alienating herself while simultaneously begging for attention. These kids need some guidance and they sure won't get it from the principle. They get it by realizing that other kids are having the same situations and it is what you make of it and how you deal with these that makes you a good person or not. Maybe you don't want to watch a movie about individualism and expression in hardship, fine, go watch The Rock lift weights and Schwarzenegger blow shit up but don't say it's a better movie.
The ending of the movie is left ambiguous and that is ok, it is intentional, and some of the best movies have ambiguous endings. We see most of them come together in some of the deepest ways, only for it to be fleeting, or not, we don't know. The endgame, to me, is not the point of the movie. Does Bender and Claire get together? Who cares, we know they have changed in some way and now they do what is best, disband and reflect (Campbell's 12th step). If the movie was about them getting together and will they or won't they is teased throughout the whole movie sure maybe we need an answer, but for all of these kids, the ambiguity is what makes them relatable, because they have a lot more life ahead of them and a lot more decisions to make.
Comparing The Breakfast Club to Community is where I get most of my opinion from. The pilot episode of Community draws heavily on the story that Breakfast Club shares, totally opposite people discovering how they can connect with each other. This works so well in television because it is an extremely flexible format with also has a great deal of emotional weight to it. In Community they all start off as basic stereotypes, but if you look at them now, in the 5th season, they all hold some of that same person they were but they had a chance to grow. The thing I love about Community is that it knows the show is about the characters and it gives them a chance to change. The characters aren't the butt of some science joke that is explained by the person put in the show solely to explain science jokes. This is why Community is better than Breakfast Club, in my opinion. Because it simply has more time.
In short, Breakfast Club is a good movie. Not because it is so famous by all those teenagers, or that it put some famous things into pop culture, but because it knew what it wanted to do with the characters and performed that in a compelling way.
Sincerely,
The people who like The Breakfast Club club
I agree with you that the Breakfast Club is very easy for us all to relate to. Sixteen Candles is another one of Hughes films that we can easily relate to. Both movies demonstrate the awkwardness of being a teenager and all that high school entails. I was also ok with the ambiguous ending. For some films it works, and for some it just doesn't. It definitely worked with this film. We are left wondering what will happen next, but like you said, it does not matter because these characters are young and have a lot to look forward to.
ReplyDeleteWhat I like about your particular defense is that your argument is structural--here's what Hughes does with this particular set of stock characters in a stock situation, until it deepens into an actual character study. In that light, it's not a story about bonding together or overcoming obstacles, but a look at people in a situation (a "bottle episode" in a tv show). I'm not sure Community is the best point of comparison, as Community is more like taking stereotypical characters, putting them in absurd situations, and having it all be as meta and self-reflexive as possible. But I like your analysis of Hughes very much. I hadn't thought about it that way, and it explains the staginess, the oddly flat camera work, and the psychodrama by way of plot. I'd have liked it even better if you'd mentioned the reading (you might even argue, fairly, that even the class tensions were part of the artifice and stock situation), but this is a really good, original, convincing analysis.
ReplyDelete